This week in a decision that will affect a wide range of land-use regulations, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a Florida property owner was unfairly required to compensate in exchange for the ability to develop property in the case known as Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Agency. The case examined the extent to which a local government can place conditions on the issuance of land use permits.

For more detail, click here for a story written by Mike Berger who filed an amicus curiae brief supporting the property owner on behalf of a virtual “who’s who” of the business, real estate, and development communities of BOMA, NAIOP, and ICSC.

© 2007-2012 Building Owners and Managers Association of California (BOMA Cal)